Posts Tagged ‘advertising’
Keep your head out of the sand.
Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011
Why was 2010 such a banner year for the Publicis Groupe? Is it Maurice Lévy, CEO? “The shock that the Internet caused is still not finished,” Mr Lévy says. “We need to be ahead of the curve; otherwise we will not be able to accompany the client of tomorrow.”
Acquisitions:
2000 Saatchi & Saatchi
2001 Leo Burnett Worldwide
2007 Digitas (online marketing)
2008 Performics (search marketing)
2009 Razorfish (largest digital agency)
It’s not about being all things to all people – it’s about watching the trends and owning brands that are of the future. Advertising agencies are interesting entities, since it is their job to understand consumers and keep clients and their products relevant, yet they struggle to stay relevant themselves. Agencies have always tried to be a one-stop shops, but now the industry is so specialized that no one agency can do it all. It is important to work with a variety of talent.
That’s why Lévy gets it. Sales and margins improved in 2010 and the company purchased a PR firm in China and 49% of a talent agency in Brazil. In 2011, it started by purchasing Chemistry agency in Brazil. Lévy doesn’t rebrand the companies he buys. He buys them so that his holding company has strength in the direction things are going.
Tags: advertising, digital marketing
Posted in 2011, Strategy | No Comments »
Caveat emptor, or in this case let the voter beware.
Thursday, October 28th, 2010
In 2006, the Arizona voters approved a tax on tobacco to provide funding for early childhood health and development, as well as parenting programs for Arizona families. This initiative is called First Things First.
It’s now 2010 and the legislature has put Proposition 302 on the ballot to terminate this voter approved program and services to sweep existing and future funds into the state’s general fund. According to the Arizona Republic, the Legislature claims the money is needed to help balance the state budget. “If approved, Prop 302 would send $345 million to the general fund to help draw down the current $825 million deficit. The money would not have to be spent on the types of health and welfare programs that First Things First supports; however, the ongoing collections from the tobacco tax would be directed into child health and social-service programs that the Legislature would oversee.”

What does this ad support, when a yes vote on Prop 302, dismantles the early childhood initiative First Things First?
Clearly, a “Yes” vote for Proposition 302 will dismantle First Things First and eliminate funding for early childhood health and development programs. Which makes the following campaign slogan very misleading. Rather deceptive, don’t you think?
As the elections approach voters should beware of deceptive messaging practices.
Get informed, get out to vote.
Tags: advertising, consumer perception
Posted in 2010 | No Comments »
What is Marketing?
Thursday, September 16th, 2010
I had a client ask me that question the other day and it got me thinking that there are probably a lot of people in business that really do not understand the depth of marketing. This particular client described marketing as an occasional ad and his sponsorship presence. Hmmm. . . of course marketing includes advertising and sponsorships, but what about. . .
. . . the customer service department?
. . . the billing department?
. . . the purchase experience off and online?
. . . the product design?
. . . packaging?
. . . product delivery?
. . . the web site?
. . . the facebook page?
. . . the product performance?
. . . the twitter account?
. . . communications after the sale?
. . . the competition?
. . . what people are saying off and online?
. . . how the company treats its employees?
. . . the company’s personality?
. . . the physical office or store?
Tags: advertising, brand strategy, consumer experience
Posted in 2010 | No Comments »
Quack Marketing
Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010
Yesterday while reading the ever serious Harvard Business Review, I really quacked up.
A piece expertly written by the CEO of Aflac, Daniel P. Amos entitled “How He Fell for the Duck“ was the culprit. It was about how he fell for the duck, how the duck grew the business and how the duck went global. It reminded me how important it is to approach marketing with an open mind.

FreeFoto.com
Not that a duck, or for that matter a gecko is right for every client’s marketing campaign, but being safe usually is not a big winner either. In marketing moving forward with calculated risk is a good thing.
Calculated? Think of a game of bridge. It is defined as a game of skill and chance. Decisions are made based on the players’ knowledge of what has already transpired and their tactical abilities. The style and demeanor of each team factors into the play, and of course the luck of the draw. In marketing we are faced with much of the same challenges.
1. Know the market – What has already transpired and what is the projected environment?
2. Recognize the advantages – What makes your company/product/service special?
3. Study the consumer – What are their motivations and why are they relevant?
4. Set objectives – What are the desired results of the campaign?
All these questions help assess risk. But how much risk should you take? Mr. Amos said, “Don’t risk a lot for a little; don’t risk more than you can afford to lose; and consider the odds.” The duck debuted on New Year’s Day 2000. If you are risk adverse, play it safe. Puppies and cute babies are always a sure bet.
Tags: advertising, global marketing, marketing, risk
Posted in 2010 | No Comments »


e pieces of advertising, art and memories. They were first commercially produced in the 1890s in the United States. But it wasn’t until the 1940s that they began to reach commercial success as an advertising medium. Matchbooks served as reminders of products, restaurants and destinations for nearly five decades.